-
Archives
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- April 2007
-
Meta
Does Twitter Encourage Disloyalty?
A few days ago I read a comment from Jesse Stay in which he was suggesting that Twitter encourages Disloyalty?.
He feels that Twitter encourages potential blog subscribers to not subscribe, but rely on Twitter links instead to reach the content that they want to read.
I’m not so sure that this is vastly different from subscribing to a blog’s RSS feed, and then only reading the articles that have headers that look potentially interesting. We’re using the RSS feed as a filter in that case, and surely this is what we’re doing with Twitter.
Combined with search strings and hashtags, this Does make using Tweets to find the content you want very appealing. It’s certainly much quicker than wading through a whole blog, and perhaps even quicker than scanning down a list from that RSS feed too.
If you’re already a frequent Twitter user, you’re probably already set up with a Twitter client such as Seesmic or Tweetdeck, where it’s easy to set up these searches. I have a few set up in Tweetdeck, in a separate column.
Of course there are many other ways to find content, search engines being the obvious one. There’s also real-time search such as Collecta, and services such as Backtype. I use these two.
Having said all this, if I find a really interesting blog, with a high proportion of posts of interest to me, then I will subscribe, and it goes on my small reading list. (I have to keep it small or I’d never read most of it, and that would defeat the point of having a reading list in the first place).